Forschungsprojekte
Im Folgenden finden Sie einige Informationen über abgeschlossene bzw. aktuell laufende Forschungsprojekte an der Fakultät, welche über das Forschungsinformationssystem zur Verfügung gestellt werden. Darüber hinaus finden Sie weitere Informationen zu Projekten auch über die Webseiten der jeweiligen Institute und Professuren.
2016
Human Reasoning in Computational Logic
Titel (Englisch)
Human Reasoning in Computational Logic
Kurzbeschreibung (Deutsch)
Until now there are no widely accepted theories that give formal representations of sophisticated human reasoning. In our project we address this issue by exploring current results from relevant research areas. The goal is to formalize a framework that allows the expression of reasoning processes which are fundamental in order to explain human behaviour. Conventional formal approaches such as classical logic are not appropriate for this purpose as they cannot deal with the most elementary parts human reasoning is confronted with e.g. incomplete information. Alternatives can be found in formalizations of weaker logics such as non-monotonic logics or three-valued logics. Furthermore, in the field of neurosicence (e.g. connectionist networks) and cognitive science (e.g. studies from psychological reasoning such as the selection and suppression task) a lot of reaserach is going on in understanding and simulating human reasoning processes. Their results are important for our purpose as they deal with similar fundamental questions about human behaviour.
Kurzbeschreibung (Englisch)
Until now there are no widely accepted theories that give formal representations of sophisticated human reasoning. In our project we address this issue by exploring current results from relevant research areas. The goal is to formalize a framework that allows the expression of reasoning processes which are fundamental in order to explain human behaviour. Conventional formal approaches such as classical logic are not appropriate for this purpose as they cannot deal with the most elementary parts human reasoning is confronted with e.g. incomplete information. Alternatives can be found in formalizations of weaker logics such as non-monotonic logics or three-valued logics. Furthermore, in the field of neurosicence (e.g. connectionist networks) and cognitive science (e.g. studies from psychological reasoning such as the selection and suppression task) a lot of reaserach is going on in understanding and simulating human reasoning processes. Their results are important for our purpose as they deal with similar fundamental questions about human behaviour.
Zeitraum
12/2011
Art der Finanzierung
TUD Haushalt
Projektleiter
- Herr Prof. Steffen Hölldobler
Projektmitarbeiter
- Frau Emmanuelle Dietz
Finanzierungseinrichtungen
- TUD
Kooperationspartnerschaft
keine
Website zum Projekt
Relevant für den Umweltschutz
Nein
Relevant für Multimedia
Nein
Relevant für den Technologietransfer
Nein
Schlagwörter
three-valued logics, psychological reasoning, connectionist networks
Berichtsjahr
2014
2015
Human Reasoning in Computational Logic
Titel (Englisch)
Human Reasoning in Computational Logic
Kurzbeschreibung (Deutsch)
Until now there are no widely accepted theories that give formal representations of sophisticated human reasoning. In our project we address this issue by exploring current results from relevant research areas. The goal is to formalize a framework that allows the expression of reasoning processes which are fundamental in order to explain human behaviour. Conventional formal approaches such as classical logic are not appropriate for this purpose as they cannot deal with the most elementary parts human reasoning is confronted with e.g. incomplete information. Alternatives can be found in formalizations of weaker logics such as non-monotonic logics or three-valued logics. Furthermore, in the field of neurosicence (e.g. connectionist networks) and cognitive science (e.g. studies from psychological reasoning such as the selection and suppression task) a lot of reaserach is going on in understanding and simulating human reasoning processes. Their results are important for our purpose as they deal with similar fundamental questions about human behaviour.
Kurzbeschreibung (Englisch)
Until now there are no widely accepted theories that give formal representations of sophisticated human reasoning. In our project we address this issue by exploring current results from relevant research areas. The goal is to formalize a framework that allows the expression of reasoning processes which are fundamental in order to explain human behaviour. Conventional formal approaches such as classical logic are not appropriate for this purpose as they cannot deal with the most elementary parts human reasoning is confronted with e.g. incomplete information. Alternatives can be found in formalizations of weaker logics such as non-monotonic logics or three-valued logics. Furthermore, in the field of neurosicence (e.g. connectionist networks) and cognitive science (e.g. studies from psychological reasoning such as the selection and suppression task) a lot of reaserach is going on in understanding and simulating human reasoning processes. Their results are important for our purpose as they deal with similar fundamental questions about human behaviour.
Zeitraum
12/2011
Art der Finanzierung
TUD Haushalt
Projektleiter
- Herr Prof. Steffen Hölldobler
Projektmitarbeiter
- Frau Emmanuelle Dietz
Finanzierungseinrichtungen
- TUD
Kooperationspartnerschaft
keine
Website zum Projekt
Relevant für den Umweltschutz
Nein
Relevant für Multimedia
Nein
Relevant für den Technologietransfer
Nein
Schlagwörter
three-valued logics, psychological reasoning, connectionist networks
Berichtsjahr
2014
2014
Human Reasoning in Computational Logic
Titel (Englisch)
Human Reasoning in Computational Logic
Kurzbeschreibung (Deutsch)
Until now there are no widely accepted theories that give formal representations of sophisticated human reasoning. In our project we address this issue by exploring current results from relevant research areas. The goal is to formalize a framework that allows the expression of reasoning processes which are fundamental in order to explain human behaviour. Conventional formal approaches such as classical logic are not appropriate for this purpose as they cannot deal with the most elementary parts human reasoning is confronted with e.g. incomplete information. Alternatives can be found in formalizations of weaker logics such as non-monotonic logics or three-valued logics. Furthermore, in the field of neurosicence (e.g. connectionist networks) and cognitive science (e.g. studies from psychological reasoning such as the selection and suppression task) a lot of reaserach is going on in understanding and simulating human reasoning processes. Their results are important for our purpose as they deal with similar fundamental questions about human behaviour.
Kurzbeschreibung (Englisch)
Until now there are no widely accepted theories that give formal representations of sophisticated human reasoning. In our project we address this issue by exploring current results from relevant research areas. The goal is to formalize a framework that allows the expression of reasoning processes which are fundamental in order to explain human behaviour. Conventional formal approaches such as classical logic are not appropriate for this purpose as they cannot deal with the most elementary parts human reasoning is confronted with e.g. incomplete information. Alternatives can be found in formalizations of weaker logics such as non-monotonic logics or three-valued logics. Furthermore, in the field of neurosicence (e.g. connectionist networks) and cognitive science (e.g. studies from psychological reasoning such as the selection and suppression task) a lot of reaserach is going on in understanding and simulating human reasoning processes. Their results are important for our purpose as they deal with similar fundamental questions about human behaviour.
Zeitraum
12/2011
Art der Finanzierung
TUD Haushalt
Projektleiter
- Herr Prof. Steffen Hölldobler
Projektmitarbeiter
- Frau Emmanuelle Dietz
Finanzierungseinrichtungen
- TUD
Kooperationspartnerschaft
keine
Website zum Projekt
Relevant für den Umweltschutz
Nein
Relevant für Multimedia
Nein
Relevant für den Technologietransfer
Nein
Schlagwörter
three-valued logics, psychological reasoning, connectionist networks
Berichtsjahr
2014
2013
Human Reasoning in Computational Logic
Titel (Englisch)
Human Reasoning in Computational Logic
Kurzbeschreibung (Deutsch)
Until now there are no widely accepted theories that give formal representations of sophisticated human reasoning. In our project we address this issue by exploring current results from relevant research areas. The goal is to formalize a framework that allows the expression of reasoning processes which are fundamental in order to explain human behaviour. Conventional formal approaches such as classical logic are not appropriate for this purpose as they cannot deal with the most elementary parts human reasoning is confronted with e.g. incomplete information. Alternatives can be found in formalizations of weaker logics such as non-monotonic logics or three-valued logics. Furthermore, in the field of neurosicence (e.g. connectionist networks) and cognitive science (e.g. studies from psychological reasoning such as the selection and suppression task) a lot of reaserach is going on in understanding and simulating human reasoning processes. Their results are important for our purpose as they deal with similar fundamental questions about human behaviour.
Kurzbeschreibung (Englisch)
Until now there are no widely accepted theories that give formal representations of sophisticated human reasoning. In our project we address this issue by exploring current results from relevant research areas. The goal is to formalize a framework that allows the expression of reasoning processes which are fundamental in order to explain human behaviour. Conventional formal approaches such as classical logic are not appropriate for this purpose as they cannot deal with the most elementary parts human reasoning is confronted with e.g. incomplete information. Alternatives can be found in formalizations of weaker logics such as non-monotonic logics or three-valued logics. Furthermore, in the field of neurosicence (e.g. connectionist networks) and cognitive science (e.g. studies from psychological reasoning such as the selection and suppression task) a lot of reaserach is going on in understanding and simulating human reasoning processes. Their results are important for our purpose as they deal with similar fundamental questions about human behaviour.
Zeitraum
12/2011
Art der Finanzierung
TUD Haushalt
Projektleiter
- Herr Prof. Steffen Hölldobler
Projektmitarbeiter
- Frau Emmanuelle Dietz
Finanzierungseinrichtungen
- TUD
Kooperationspartnerschaft
keine
Website zum Projekt
Relevant für den Umweltschutz
Nein
Relevant für Multimedia
Nein
Relevant für den Technologietransfer
Nein
Schlagwörter
three-valued logics, psychological reasoning, connectionist networks
Berichtsjahr
2014
2012
Human Reasoning in Computational Logic
Titel (Englisch)
Human Reasoning in Computational Logic
Kurzbeschreibung (Deutsch)
Until now there are no widely accepted theories that give formal representations of sophisticated human reasoning. In our project we address this issue by exploring current results from relevant research areas. The goal is to formalize a framework that allows the expression of reasoning processes which are fundamental in order to explain human behaviour. Conventional formal approaches such as classical logic are not appropriate for this purpose as they cannot deal with the most elementary parts human reasoning is confronted with e.g. incomplete information. Alternatives can be found in formalizations of weaker logics such as non-monotonic logics or three-valued logics. Furthermore, in the field of neurosicence (e.g. connectionist networks) and cognitive science (e.g. studies from psychological reasoning such as the selection and suppression task) a lot of reaserach is going on in understanding and simulating human reasoning processes. Their results are important for our purpose as they deal with similar fundamental questions about human behaviour.
Kurzbeschreibung (Englisch)
Until now there are no widely accepted theories that give formal representations of sophisticated human reasoning. In our project we address this issue by exploring current results from relevant research areas. The goal is to formalize a framework that allows the expression of reasoning processes which are fundamental in order to explain human behaviour. Conventional formal approaches such as classical logic are not appropriate for this purpose as they cannot deal with the most elementary parts human reasoning is confronted with e.g. incomplete information. Alternatives can be found in formalizations of weaker logics such as non-monotonic logics or three-valued logics. Furthermore, in the field of neurosicence (e.g. connectionist networks) and cognitive science (e.g. studies from psychological reasoning such as the selection and suppression task) a lot of reaserach is going on in understanding and simulating human reasoning processes. Their results are important for our purpose as they deal with similar fundamental questions about human behaviour.
Zeitraum
12/2011
Art der Finanzierung
TUD Haushalt
Projektleiter
- Herr Prof. Steffen Hölldobler
Projektmitarbeiter
- Frau Emmanuelle Dietz
Finanzierungseinrichtungen
- TUD
Kooperationspartnerschaft
keine
Website zum Projekt
Relevant für den Umweltschutz
Nein
Relevant für Multimedia
Nein
Relevant für den Technologietransfer
Nein
Schlagwörter
three-valued logics, psychological reasoning, connectionist networks
Berichtsjahr
2014
2011
Human Reasoning in Computational Logic
Titel (Englisch)
Human Reasoning in Computational Logic
Kurzbeschreibung (Deutsch)
Until now there are no widely accepted theories that give formal representations of sophisticated human reasoning. In our project we address this issue by exploring current results from relevant research areas. The goal is to formalize a framework that allows the expression of reasoning processes which are fundamental in order to explain human behaviour. Conventional formal approaches such as classical logic are not appropriate for this purpose as they cannot deal with the most elementary parts human reasoning is confronted with e.g. incomplete information. Alternatives can be found in formalizations of weaker logics such as non-monotonic logics or three-valued logics. Furthermore, in the field of neurosicence (e.g. connectionist networks) and cognitive science (e.g. studies from psychological reasoning such as the selection and suppression task) a lot of reaserach is going on in understanding and simulating human reasoning processes. Their results are important for our purpose as they deal with similar fundamental questions about human behaviour.
Kurzbeschreibung (Englisch)
Until now there are no widely accepted theories that give formal representations of sophisticated human reasoning. In our project we address this issue by exploring current results from relevant research areas. The goal is to formalize a framework that allows the expression of reasoning processes which are fundamental in order to explain human behaviour. Conventional formal approaches such as classical logic are not appropriate for this purpose as they cannot deal with the most elementary parts human reasoning is confronted with e.g. incomplete information. Alternatives can be found in formalizations of weaker logics such as non-monotonic logics or three-valued logics. Furthermore, in the field of neurosicence (e.g. connectionist networks) and cognitive science (e.g. studies from psychological reasoning such as the selection and suppression task) a lot of reaserach is going on in understanding and simulating human reasoning processes. Their results are important for our purpose as they deal with similar fundamental questions about human behaviour.
Zeitraum
12/2011
Art der Finanzierung
TUD Haushalt
Projektleiter
- Herr Prof. Steffen Hölldobler
Projektmitarbeiter
- Frau Emmanuelle Dietz
Finanzierungseinrichtungen
- TUD
Kooperationspartnerschaft
keine
Website zum Projekt
Relevant für den Umweltschutz
Nein
Relevant für Multimedia
Nein
Relevant für den Technologietransfer
Nein
Schlagwörter
three-valued logics, psychological reasoning, connectionist networks
Berichtsjahr
2014