Courses
Important Information
Please note that all information provided in the Annotated Course Catalogue is subject to change. While we strive for accuracy, all details are provided without guarantee, and ongoing adjustments or updates (e.g., regarding schedules, rooms, or instructors) may occur at any time.
It is therefore recommended to check the entries regularly for the latest updates.
Overall view – summer semester 2026
MA-IB-GTE
(Geschichte, Theorie und aktuelle Fragen der Politik Europas)
- Seminar – [Pw IP - Kleinschmidt] Geschichte, Theorien u. aktuelle Fragen der Politik Europas
- Teacher
-
- Dr. Jochen Kleinschmidt
- Max attendee capacity
- 35
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Monday 3rd double period HSZ/0105/U In-person - Description
- Dieser Kurs wendet einen historisch-soziologischen Ansatz auf die Analyse europäischer Politik und Geschichte an. Dieser basiert auf der Beobachtung und theoretischen Interpretation langfristiger Interaktionsmuster zwischen sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Strukturen, internationalen Systemen und militärischen Konflikten. Insbesondere wird auf entscheidende Transformationsprozesse in der europäischen Geschichte – wie Staatenformation, Revolutionen, der Aufstieg von Absolutismus, Imperialismus, Faschismus, der liberalen Demokratie und der modernen Konsumgesellschaft, die beiden Weltkriege, der Kalte Krieg, die europäische Einigung und ihre Krise sowie der gegenwärtige Angriffskrieg Russlands gegen die Ukraine – eingegangen. Auch die Beziehungen Europas zu anderen Teilen der Welt, und hier insbesondere die transatlantischen Beziehungen, werden thematisiert. Erfolgreiche Teilnehmer*innen erwerben ein fortgeschrittenes Verständnis der begrifflichen und theoretischen Debatten über europäische Politik und Geschichte in den Internationalen Beziehungen und in angrenzenden Disziplinen.
- Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Zeitfenster Lehramt
- Seminar – [Pw Sys - Mendes] The Far Right in Europe
- Teacher
-
- Dr. Mariana Mendes
- Max attendee capacity
- 35
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Not specified
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Wednesday 5th double period HSZ/0405/U In-person - Description
- The far right or radical right is the most studied party family in contemporary political science. This burgeoning interest is, in part, the outcome of its growing success in recent years. While for decades these parties were considered to be ‘beyond the pale’, they have joined an increasing number of governments in Europe (and beyond) and shaped political and social dynamics in various ways. This course aims to take stock of the causes and consequences of far right success. It is primarily designed to provide students with a comprehensive and up-to-date introduction to the study of this party family. While taking a broad comparative perspective, this course is primarily focused on Europe and largely centered on political parties. By the end of the course, students will be familiar with the most important debates in the discipline of far right studies and with the wide range of topics and approaches that have been taken. Furthermore, student presentations will deal with specific case-studies (they will be able to choose a party/ country they want to focus on), so as to make them familiar with specific contexts. The seminar format is also meant to encourage the development of analytical and communication skills, as well as the use of the English language. Important: Students will not be penalized for their English level (they should rather take this as an opportunity for practice and improvement). The course assessment is based on (1) a presentation in class, (2) a short final paper, and (3) active participation. The seminar is structured into four parts. In the first part – Concepts & Issues – we will tackle conceptual and terminological questions and introduce some of the core ideological themes of this party family. We will also shed light on the concept of ‘populism’ more broadly and how it relates to the far right. In a second part – Causes – we will address the multiple drivers and facilitators of far right success, focusing both on proximate and contextual factors as well as on long-term structural changes. In a third part – Voters – we will look into the attitudes and profile of far right voters, underlying the relative importance of anti-immigration and populist attitudes, but also exploring the socio-psychological and socio-demographic bases of the vote. Finally, in a fourth part – Consequences – we will discuss these parties’ impact across four different dimensions: political competition; policies; norms and societal polarization; and the quality of democracy.
- Literature
-
- Arzheimer, Kai (2018). Explaining Electoral Support for the Radical Right. In The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, edited by Jens Rydgren, 143-165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bursztyn, Leonardo, Georgy Egorov, and Stefano Fiorin (2020). From Extreme to Mainstream: The Erosion of Social Norms. American Economic Review 110(10), 2997-3029.
- Copsey, Nigel (2018). The Radical Right and Fascism. In The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, edited by Jens Rydgren, 105-121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gidron, Noam, & Peter A. Hall (2020). Populism as a Problem of Social Integration. Comparative Political Studies, 53(7), 1027-1059.
- Lutz, Philipp (2019). Variation in policy success: radical right populism and migration policy, West European Politics, 42:3, 517-54.
- Mansbridge, Jane, and Stephen Macedo (2019) Populism and Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15, 59-77.
- Mudde, Cas (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Chapter 1 – pp. 11-31]
- Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart (2019) Cultural Backlash. Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Chapter 2 – pp. 32-64]
- Oesch, Daniel, and Line Rennwald (2018). Electoral competition in Europe's new tripolar political space: Class voting for the left, centre-right and radical right. European Journal of Political Research, 57: 783-807.
- Stockemer, Daniel, Daphne Halikiopoulou and Tim Vlandas (2020) Birds of a feather’? Assessing the prevalence of anti-immigration attitudes among the far right electorate, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(15), 3409-3436.
- Vachudova, Milada Anna (2020). Ethnopopulism and democratic backsliding in Central Europe, East European Politics, 36:3, 318-340.
- Vasilopoulou, Sofia (2018). The Radical Right and Euroskepticism. In The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, edited by Jens Rydgren, 122-140. Oxford: Oxford University Pres.
- Wagner, Markus, and Thomas M. Meyer (2017). The Radical Right as Niche Parties? The Ideological Landscape of Party Systems in Western Europe, 1980–2014. Political Studies, 65(1_suppl), 84-107.
MA-IB-IMS
(Internationaler Menschenrechtsschutz)
- Lecture – [IR VRÖffR - Steiger] Menschenrechte
- Teacher
-
- Prof. Dr. Dominik Steiger
- Max attendee capacity
- 80
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Not specified
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Thursday 3rd double period ABS/0E04/U In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Lehrplanung
MA-IB-FD
(Forschungsdesign)
- Forschungskolloquium – [Pw IP - Holzscheiter] Forschungskolloqium für Examenskandidaten
- Teacher
-
- Prof. Dr. Anna Holzscheiter
- Max attendee capacity
- 25
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Wednesday 6th double period ABS/2-07/U In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Lehrplanung
MA-IB-TIO
(Theorien Internationaler Organisationen)
- Seminar – [Pw IP - Kleinschmidt] Accelerated Change in World Politics: Theories, Actors, Strategies
- Teacher
-
- Dr. Jochen Kleinschmidt
- Max attendee capacity
- 40
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Wednesday 5th double period ABS/2-01/U In-person - Description
- Phenomena of accelerated change in world politics, variously interpreted as organic crisis, polycrisis, collapse of the liberal international order, a shift towards multipolarity, or democratic backsliding, among other concepts, are receiving increased attention in academic International Relations.
This seminar will evaluate such diagnoses through a dual focus on their theoretical, conceptual, and historical context on one hand, and on the practical strategies adopted by a variety of actors, but mostly by international governmental organizations (IGOs), on the other.
Students will therefore participate both in theoretical-conceptual debates as well as in policy discussions, with the aim of achieving intellectual synergies between the two. As an advanced seminar, classroom debates will generally be student-led, relying on a high degree of participant engagement.
The language of instruction in this course is English. - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Lehrplanung
MA-IB-ATP
(Aktuelle Themen der Internationalen Politik)
- Seminar – [Pw Theo - Dhawan] Human Rights and its Critics
- Teacher
-
- Prof. Dr. Nikita Dhawan
- Max attendee capacity
- 50
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Enrollment deadline
- From
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Tuesday 5th double period ABS/0E04/U In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Zeitfenster Lehramt
- Seminar – [Pw IP - Bakalov] Selbständig forschen: Qualitative Research Design for the Social Sciences
- Teacher
-
- Ivan Bakalov
- Max attendee capacity
- 25
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Thursday 2nd double period ABS/1-01/U In-person - Description
- This seminar aims to introduce participants to the foundations of qualitative research in the social sciences (with a focus on the disciplines of International Relations, International Political Economy, and Political Science) and to prepare them for engaging in independent academic research. The seminar is guided by a pluralist understanding of qualitative research that includes both positivist (i.e. studying causality) and interpretivist (i.e. studying the constitution of meaning) methodologies. The strengths and limitations of these methodologies will be explored in open in-class discussions. Participants will be introduced to a variety of methods for data collection (e.g. interviewing, ethnographic research, archival research) and analysis (e.g. congruence method, content analysis, discourse analysis). Special attention will be given to providing guidelines for developing coherent research designs that align the logic of inference with the employed methods for data collection and analysis. In addition to discussing the fundamentals of qualitative research, participants will be exposed to practical how-to questions that are essential for producing high-quality research output on the BA and MA levels (e.g. research question, literature review). The separate blocks in the seminar structure build on each other, therefore the successful attainment of the learning objectives is dependent on regular attendance and active participation. The seminar relies extensively on interactive discussions that aim to unpack pre-assigned readings and to address challenges identified by the participants. The language of instruction is English.
MA-IB-TDE
(Transdisziplinäre Ergänzung)
- Seminar – [Pw Theo - van Ooyen] Die Staats- und Demokratietheorie des Bundesverfassungsgerichts
- Teacher
-
- Prof. Dr. Robert Christian van Ooyen
- Max attendee capacity
- 35
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Enrollment deadline
- From
- Appointments
-
Date Clock time Place Event format to ausstehend In-person to ausstehend In-person to ausstehend In-person to ausstehend In-person to ausstehend In-person - Description
- Das „Politikverständnis“ des Bundesverfassungsgerichts im Spannungsfeld von Macht und Recht aus Sicht der politischen Theorie, erarbeitet anhand der Lektüre zentraler Entscheidungen (insb. Parteiverbotsverfahren von SRP bis NPD II – Ausländerwahlrecht und Kopftuch I-III – Einsatz Bundeswehr – EU von Solange I bis Post-Lissabon). Ausgangspunkt bildet dabei der zentrale Theoriestreit um den „Hüter der Verfassung“ der Kelsen-Schmitt-Kontroverse.
- Literature
-
- Badura/Dreier (Hg.): Festschrift 50 Jahre Bundesverfassungsgericht, Tübingen 2001
- Baer: Rote Linien, Freiburg 2025
- Brodocz: Die Macht der Judikative, Wiesbaden 2009
- Collings: Democracy’s Guardians. A History of the German Constitutional Court, Oxford 2015
- Czermak: 70 Jahre Bundesverfassungsgericht in ideologischer Schieflage, Baden-Baden 2021
- Darnstädt: Verschlusssache Karlsruhe, München 2018
- Foschepoth: Verfassungswidrig! Das KPD-Verbot im Kalten Bürgerkrieg, 2. Aufl., Göttingen 2021
- Gawron/Rogowski: Die Wirkung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, Baden-Baden 2007
- Gawron: Bundesverfassungsgericht und Religionsgemeinschaften, Berlin 2017
- Gawron: Private und Bundesverfassungsgericht, Berlin 2021
- Gawron/Lembcke/van Ooyen: Reform des Bundesverfassungsgerichts?, Berlin 2021
- Grigoleit: Bundesverfassungsgericht und deutsche Frage, Tübingen 2004
- Grimm: Recht oder Politik? Die Kelsen-Schmitt-Kontroverse…, Berlin 2020
- Häberle: Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit – Verfassungsprozessrecht, Berlin 2014
- Henne/Riedlinger: Das Lüth-Urteil aus (rechts-)historischer Sicht, Berlin 2005
- Hönnige: Verfassungsgericht, Regierung und Opposition, Wiesbaden 2007
- Jestaedt/Möllers/Lepsius/Schönberger: Das entgrenzte Gericht, Frankfurt a.M. 2011
- Kelsen: Wer soll der Hüter der Verfassung sein?, Neuausgabe, 2. Aufl., Tübingen 2019
- Kneip: Verfassungsgerichte als demokratische Akteure, Baden-Baden, 2009
- Kommers: Judicial Politics in West Germany, Beverly Hills – London 1976
- Kranenpohl: Hinter dem Schleier des Beratungsgeheimnisses, Wiesbaden 2011
- Kuhn: Bundesverfassungsgericht und Parlamentarismus, Baden-Baden 2021
- Kulick/Vasel: Das konservative Gericht, Tübingen 2021
- Lamprecht: Das Bundesverfassungsgericht, BpB, Bonn 2011
- Landfried: Bundesverfassungsgericht und Gesetzgeber, Baden-Baden 1996
- Lembcke: Der Hüter der Verfassung, Tübingen 2007
- Lembcke: Das öffentliche Ansehen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, Berlin 2007
- Lhotta/Ketelhut/Schöne (Hg.): Das Lissabon-Urteil, Wiesbaden 2013
- Lietzmann: Das Bundesverfassungsgericht, Opladen 1988
- Menzel/Müller-Terpitz (Hg.): Verfassungsrechtsprechung, 3. Aufl., Tübingen 2017
- Möllers: Der vermisste Leviathan, Frankfurt a.M. 2008
- Möllers/van Ooyen (Hg.): Parteiverbotsverfahren, 5. Aufl., Frankfurt a.M. 2017
- van Ooyen: Der Begriff des Politischen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, Berlin 2005
- van Ooyen: Bundesverfassungsgericht und politische Theorie, Wiesbaden 2015
- van Ooyen: Der Staat der Moderne. Hans Kelsens Pluralismustheorie, 2. Aufl., Berlin 2020
- van Ooyen: Das Bundesverfassungsgerichts und der „Kopftuch-Streit“, 4. Aufl., Frankfurt a.M. 2025
- van Ooyen: Die Staatstheorie des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und Europa, 9. Aufl., Baden- Baden 2022
- van Ooyen: Das Bundesverfassungsgerichts und der Einsatz der Bundeswehr, 5. Aufl., Frankfurt a.M. 2025
- van Ooyen/Möllers: „Der Staat ist von Verfassungs wegen nicht gehindert...“. National-liberaler Etatismus im Staatsverständnis des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, Baden-Baden 2021
- van Ooyen/Möllers: Das Bundesverfassungsgericht im Politikfeld Öffentliche Sicherheit, 6 Bde, Frankfurt a.M. 2025
- van Ooyen/Möllers (Hg.): HB Bundesverfassungsgericht im politischen System, 3. Aufl., Wiesbaden 2025
- Schaal: Integration durch Verfassung und Verfassungsrechtsprechung?, Berlin 2000
- Schlaich/Korioth: Das Bundesverfassungsgericht, 12. Aufl., München 2021
- Schäller: Föderalismus und Souveränität im Bundesstaat, Wiesbaden 2016
- Schmitt: Der Hüter der Verfassung, 4. Aufl., Berlin 1996
- Stolleis (Hg.): Herzkammern der Republik, München 2011
- Stüwe: Die Opposition im Bundestag und das Bundesverfassungsgericht, Baden-Baden 1997
- Vanberg: The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany, Cambridge 2005
- Vorländer (Hg.): Die Deutungsmacht der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit, Wiesbaden 2006
- Wiegandt: Norm und Wirklichkeit. Gerhard Leibholz (1901-1982), Baden-Baden 1995
- Wendenburg: Die Debatte um die Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit und der Methodenstreit in der Weimarer Republik, Göttingen 1984
- Wöhst: Hüter der Demokratie, Wiesbaden 2017
- Wrase/Boulanger (Hg.): Die Politik des Verfassungsrechts, Baden-Baden 2013.
- Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Zeitfenster Lehramt
- Seminar – [Pw Theo - Dhawan] Theories of Violence and Nonviolence
- Teacher
-
- Prof. Dr. Nikita Dhawan
- Max attendee capacity
- 50
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Enrollment deadline
- From
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Tuesday 4th double period ABS/0E04/U In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Zeitfenster Lehramt
- Seminar – [Pw Theo - Gleißner] Kritische Migrationstheorien: Exil und politische Autobiographie
- Teacher
-
- Leyla Sophie Gleißner
- Max attendee capacity
- 30
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Enrollment deadline
- From
- Appointments
-
Date Clock time Place Event format to – Online to ABS/0105/U In-person to ABS/0105/U In-person to ABS/0105/U In-person to ABS/0105/U In-person to ABS/0105/U In-person - Description
- Dieses Seminar setzt sich mit dem Potenzial autobiografisch situierten Wissens für die Arbeit an einer kritischen Theorie der Migration, der Flucht und des Exils auseinander. „Kritisch“ ist dabei nicht als Kritik an Migration zu verstehen, sondern als Ausgangspunkt einer Theorie, die soziale Gerechtigkeit und anti-rassistischen Widerstand in den Blick nimmt und konzeptuell zu unterstützen sucht. Entlang der intensiven Auseinandersetzung mit Schriften von migrantisch situierten Autorinnen* wird gemeinsam an einer begrifflichen und konzeptuellen Grundlage für ein solches Denken gearbeitet. Ergänzend werden Gastvorträge von Gästinnen aus der kritischen Rechts- und Literaturwissenschaft (Dr. Nerges Azizi – European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights und Dr. Alice Lacoue-Labarthe – Université Grenoble Alpes/ Centre Marc Bloch) sowie künstlerische Materialien, darunter ein Filmscreening („De l’autre côté“ von Chantal Akerman), in die Sitzungen einbezogen.
Inhaltlich orientiert sich das Seminar an fünf thematischen Leitlinien:
Erstens wird die Rolle sogenannter „Fremder“ sowie der „Gastfreund*innenschaft“ in der Geschichte der politischen Theorie und Philosophie diskutiert (Jacques Derrida mit Bezügen zu Platon und Immanuel Kant, Georg Simmel).
Zweitens wird die Bedeutung von Grenzen und deren Überschreitung sowie die Begrenzung individueller und kollektiver Rechte im Kontext von Flucht und Migration diskutiert (Hannah Arendt, Gloria E. Anzaldúa).
Drittens widmet sich das Seminar zeitgenössischen intersektional-feministischen Theorien zu migrantischem Widerstand sowie aktivistischen Praktiken desselben (Sara Ahmed, Mariana Ortega).
Viertens werden migrantische Poetiken sowie sprachliche Dimensionen kolonialer Gewalt und Assimilation in den Blick genommen (Arendt, Derrida, Frantz Fanon).
Fünftens werden die singulären wie politischen Konsequenzen einer unmöglichen Rückkehr aus dem Exil sowie die Bedeutung die daraus folgend dem Schreiben beigemessen wird, ausgelotet (Edward Said, Saidiya Hartman).
Drei der Themenblöcke werden durch Gastvorträge und künstlerische Materialien erweitert:
Im zweiten Themenblock referiert Dr. Nerges Azizi (ECCHR – European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights) zum Verhältnis zwischen Recht und Widerstand geflüchteter Menschen.
Im dritten Themenblock wird ein Screening von Chantal Akermans Film „De l’autre côté“ („Von der anderen Seite“) gezeigt, der Flucht und Grenzgewalt an der mexikanisch-US-amerikanischen Grenze thematisiert. Dies geschieht mit freundlicher Unterstützung der Foundation Chantal Akerman.
Im vierten Themenblock hält Dr. Alice Lacoue-Labarthe (Université Grenoble Alpes / Centre Marc Bloch) einen Vortrag zu Poetik und Assimilation im Kontext von Literaturen der sogenannten „Flüchtlingskrise“.
Die Bereitschaft zu Lektüre und Diskussion wird vorausgesetzt. - Literature
-
- Die vorbereitende Lektüre des folgenden Texts wird empfohlen:
- Ahmed, Sara (1999). Home and away: Narratives of migration and estrangement. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2(3), 329-347.
- Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Zeitfenster Lehramt
- Seminar – [Pw Theo - Arenhövel] Demokratie und Erinnerung
- Teacher
-
- Prof. Dr. Mark Arenhövel
- Max attendee capacity
- 40
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Enrollment deadline
- From
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Tuesday 4th double period ABS/2-01/U In-person - Description
- Die Kulturwissenschaftlerin Aleida Assmann bemerkt in ihrem Buch „Das neue Unbehagen an der Erinnerungskultur“ einleitend, es stelle sich vermehrt die Frage, welche Rolle die (deutsche) Erinnerungskultur fortan in unserer Gesellschaft spielen soll, ob sie überhaupt fortgesetzt werden solle, und wenn ja, wie? In unserem Seminar wollen wir der Frage nachgehen, welcher Zusammenhang zwischen Demokratie und kollektiver Erinnerung spielt, wie Erinnerungskulturen entstehen, wie und von wem sie gestaltet werden und wie die aktuelle Debatte um das Verhältnis von Holocaustgedenken und Kolonialismus zu bewerten ist.
Dabei befragen wir einige Demokratietheorien auf ihre Einbeziehung kommunikativer und kultureller Erinnerungen und analysieren, welche Institutionen in besonderem Maße als Speicher kollektiver Erinnerungen dienen (können). Ein Vergleich zwischen unterschiedlichen Erinnerungskulturen öffnet dann den Weg zu der spekulativen Frage, ob ein „Weltgedächtnis“ wünschbar und möglich ist. Da seit ca. 30 Jahren im Paradigma Gedächtnis/Geschichte/Erinnerungskultur eine kaum noch überschaubare Literatur im Entstehen begriffen ist, wird die selbständige Literaturrecherche der Teilnehmer:Innen des Seminars vorausgesetzt. - Literature
-
- Literatur zum Einstieg:
- Arenhövel, Mark: Demokratie und Erinnerung. Der Blick zurück auf Diktatur und Menschenrechtsverbrechen. Frankfurt am Main 2000.
- Arenhövel, Mark: Democratization and Transitional Justice, in: Democratization,15:3,570 — 587, 2008.
- Assmann, Aleida: Das neue Unbehagen an der Erinnerungskultur. München 2020.
- Herf, Jeffrey: Zweierlei Erinnerung. Die NS-Vergangenheit im geteilten Deutschland. Berlin 1998.
- Rothberg, Michael: Multidirektionale Erinnerung. Holocaustgedenken im Zeitalter der Dekolonisierung. Berlin 2021.
- Sznaider, Natan: Fluchtpunkte der Erinnerung. Über die Gegenwart von Holocaust und Kolonialismus. München und Bonn 2022.
- Seminar – [Pw Theo - Schulze Wessel] Politisches Denken: Moderne Demokratietheorien
- Teacher
-
- PD Dr. Julia Schulze Wessel
- Max attendee capacity
- 30
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Enrollment deadline
- From
- Appointments
-
Date Clock time Place Event format to ABS/0213/U In-person to HSZ/0403/H In-person to POT/0106/U In-person to ABS/0105/U In-person to ABS/0105/U In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Zeitfenster Lehramt
- Colloquium – [IR VRÖffR - Bogdanzaliew] Asyl- und Aufenthaltsrecht
- Teacher
-
- Elena Bogdanzaliew
- Max attendee capacity
- 40
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Not specified
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Monday 6th double period ABS/1-01/U In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Lehrplanung
- Colloquium – [IR VRÖffR - Bogdanzaliew] Asyl- und Aufenthaltsrecht
- Teacher
-
- Elena Bogdanzaliew
- Max attendee capacity
- 40
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Not specified
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Monday 7th double period ABS/1-01/U In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Lehrplanung
- Seminar – [Pw Sys - NN] Soziale Medien und Politik: Die strategische Nutzung digitaler Kommunikationskanäle durch politische Akteure im internationalen Vergleich
- Teacher
- N.N.
- Max attendee capacity
- 35
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Not specified
- Appointments
-
Date Clock time Place Event format to ABS/2-09/U In-person to ABS/0114/U In-person to ABS/0114/U In-person - Description
- Soziale Medien haben die politische Kommunikation grundlegend verändert. Dies gilt sowohl für Transformationen
bezogen auf die „rein kommunikativen“ Aspekte, die in der Medienwissenschaft behandelt werden,
als auch mit Blick auf Umwälzungen in der öffentlichen Legitimation politischer Entscheidungen, die Gegenstand
der Politikwissenschaft sind. In international vergleichender Perspektive lassen sich dabei signifikante
Unterschiede, teils aber auch auffallende Ähnlichkeiten in der Handhabung strategisch motivierter Online-
Interaktionen aufseiten von Politikern und Mitgliedern des „Publikums“ feststellen.
Ausgehend von einer Analyse der gewandelten Funktionen politischer Öffentlichkeit zunächst im elektronischen
und später im digitalen Zeitalter, diskutieren wir die widerstreitenden Logiken medialer und plattformzentrierter
Kommunikation. Danach geht es um die spezifischen Dynamiken von Internet-Wahlkämpfen, Kampagnen
und Protestformen im Social Web. Auch die Ziele und Strategien exekutiver politischer Akteure scheinen
bei näherer Betrachtung in interaktiven Kanälen anderen Kalkulationen zu unterliegen als in der traditionellen
politischen Kommunikation. Welche Erklärungsmodelle wurden hierzu bereits entwickelt – und warum
variieren die empirischen Resultate oft je nach nationalstaatlichem und thematischem Kontext?
Schließlich beschäftigen wir uns mit der Frage, ob mehr kommunikative Beteiligung über Social Media tatsächlich
zu mehr politischer Mitsprache und Transparenz führt. Es gibt Hinweise darauf, dass unter bestimmten
Umständen eher das Gegenteil der Fall ist, wenn Phänomene wie selektive Wahrnehmung, strategisches
Framing und Filterblasen-Effekte Debattenräume verengen statt erweitern. Das Seminar endet mit einer Darstellung
der methodischen Instrumente, die bei der sozialwissenschaftlichen Untersuchung digitaler politischer
Kommunikation zum Einsatz kommen. Die Teilnehmenden sind so auf der Basis eines kritischen Verständnisses
der wichtigsten Befunde und Analysetechniken in der Lage, eigene Forschungsfragen zu bearbeiten. - Literature
-
- Castells, M. (2007): ‘Communication, Power and Counter-Power in the Network Society.’ In: International Journal
- of Communication, 1: S. 238-266.
- Ignatow, G., und Mihalcea, R. (2017): Text Mining. A Guidebook for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Kenski, K., und Jamieson, K.H. (Hrsg.) (2019): The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. Oxford: Oxford
- University Press.
- Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (2025): Digital News Report 2025.
- .
- Strömbäck, J. (2011): ‘Mediatization of Politics. Toward a Conceptual Framework for Comparative Research.’
- In: Bucy, E.P., und Holbert, R.L. (Hrsg.), The Sourcebook for Political Communication Research. Methods,
- Measures, and Analytical Techniques. New York/Abingdon: Routledge, S. 367-382.
- Thomaß, B. (Hrsg.) (2013): Mediensysteme im internationalen Vergleich. Konstanz/München: UVK/UTB.
- Seminar – [Pw Sys - Vollmann] Autokratische Legitimationsstrategien im Vergleich
- Teacher
-
- Erik Vollmann
- Max attendee capacity
- 35
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Not specified
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Wednesday 3rd double period HSZ/0101/U In-person - Description
- „Warum überleben Regierungen? Diese bis heute aktuelle Frage stellt sich die Politische-Kultur-Forschung. Die Prämisse der Forschung lautet: „Jedes politische System versucht Stabilität zu erreichen, um seine Bestandserhaltung zu gewährleisten. Hierzu benötigt es die Anerkennung als legitim durch seine Bürger, sonst wird es über kurz oder lang zusammenbrechen und in einen anderen Aggregatzustand übergehen“ (Pickel und Pickel 2006: 52). Legitimität, d.h. der Glaube einer Bevölkerung bzw. bedeutender Segmente derselben an eine Herrschaftsordnung als rechtens, steht dabei im Mittelpunkt. Das gilt nicht nur für demokratische Systeme, auf die sich die Politische-Kultur-Forschung bisher überwiegend bezog, sondern gerade auch für Autokratien, die im Zentrum dieses Seminars stehen. Dieses Seminar bietet einen Überblick über bedeutende Ansätze der Legitimationsforschung in nicht-demokratischen Systemen. Verschiedene Konzepte und methodische Zugänge (z.B. Einstellungs-, Verhaltens- und Diskursforschung) des Forschungszweigs werden analysiert, diskutiert und kritisch eingeordnet. Hinzu erhalten die Studierenden praktische Einblicke in die Anwendungs- und Auswertungsmöglichkeiten, um Legitimationsstrategien in autokratischen Kontexten vergleichen zu können.
- Literature
-
- Beetham, David. 2013. The Legitimation of Power, 2. Aufl. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- - Dukalskis, Alexander. 2017. The Authoritarian Public Sphere. Legitimation and Autocratic Power in North Korea, Burma, and China. New York: Routledge.
- - Gerschewski, Johannes. 2013. The three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization, 20(1), 13-38. doi:10.1080/13510347.2013.738860
- - Josua, Maria. 2016. Cooptation Reconsidered: Authoritarian Regime Legitimation Strategies in the Jordanian “Arab Spring”. Middle East Law and Governance, 8(1), 32-56. doi: 10.1163/18763375-00801001
- - Kneuer, Marianne. 2013. Die Suche nach Legitimität. Außenpolitik als Legitimationsstrategie autokratischer Regime. In Steffen Kailitz und Patrick Köllner (Hrsg.), Auto-kratien im Vergleich. PVS Sonderheft 47 Nomos, S. 210-241. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845244655-210
- - Schmidtke, Henning und Steffen Schneider. 2012. Methoden der empirischen Legitimationsforschung: Legitimität als mehrdimensionales Konzept. In Anna Geis, Frank Nullmeier und Christopher Daase (Hrsg.), Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik: Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos, S. 225-242.
- - von Soest, Christian und Julia Grauvogel. 2017. Identity, procedures and performance: how authoritarian regimes legitimize their rule. Contemporary Politics, 23(3), 287-305. doi:10.1080/13569775.2017.1304319
- - Weber, Max. 2008. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Zweitausendeins, S. 157-222.
- Seminar – [Pw Theo - Al-Taher] Exile and the City - Auf den Spuren von Hannah Arendt und Edward Said zwischen Jerusalem und New York
- Teacher
-
- Hanna Al-Taher
- Max attendee capacity
- 25
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Enrollment deadline
- From
- Appointments
-
Date Clock time Place Event format to HSZ/0208/U In-person to HSZ/0208/U In-person to HSZ/0208/U In-person to HSZ/0208/U In-person to HSZ/0208/U In-person to HSZ/0208/U In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Zeitfenster Lehramt
MA-IB-EUL
(Introduction to European Union Law)
- Lecture – [IR VRIB - Horst] Introduction to European Law
- Teacher
-
- Dr. Johan Horst
- Max attendee capacity
- 70
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Monday 4th double period ABS/0E04/U In-person - Description
- Overview:
§ 1 Introduction and History of European Integration
§ 2 Introduction: Institutions
§ 3 EU Competences
§ 4 Sources of European Law and the Relationship to National Law
§ 5 Fundamental Freedoms
§ 6 The System of Judicial Protection/Enforcement
§ 7 European Citizenship
§ 8 Fundamental Rights
Short description:
This course offers a concise introduction to the European Union’s institutional law and the fundamental freedoms of the internal market. Following a brief overview of the EU’s historical development, we will examine the sources of EU Law, the EU’s institutional architecture, the division of competences, and the system of legal protection under the TFEU. Furthermore, we will consider the direct effect and the primacy (supremacy) of EU Law, and survey the Fundamental Freedoms with particular emphasis on the free movement of goods. Throughout the course, we will work with the EU Treaties and key provisions and engage with relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). - Literature
-
- Literature suggestions:
- − Chalmers/Davies/Monti/Heyvaert, European Union Law, 5th ed. 2024
- − Schütze, An Introduction to European Law, 4th ed. 2023
- − Barnard/Peers, European Union Law,4th ed. 2023 (3rd ed. 2020)
- − Craig/de Búrca, EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 8th ed. 2024 (7th ed. 2020)
- − Berry/Homewood/Bogusz, Complete EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 5th ed. 2022
- − Schütze, European Union Law, 4th ed. 2025
- − Steiner/Woods, EU Law, 15th ed. 2023
- − Kaczorowska-Ireland, European Union Law, 4th ed. 2016 (3rd ed. 2013)
- Exercise – [IR VRÖffR - NN] Introduction to European Law
- Teacher
- N.N.
- Max attendee capacity
- 40
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Not specified
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Thursday 3rd double period ABS/2-01/U In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Lehrplanung
- Exercise – [IR VRÖffR - NN] Introduction to European Law
- Teacher
- N.N.
- Max attendee capacity
- 40
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Not specified
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Thursday 4th double period ABS/2-01/U In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Lehrplanung
MA-IB-GPE
(Global Political Economy)
- Block seminar – [ZIS - Lambie] Global Political Economy
- Teacher
-
- Dr. George Robert Lambie
- Max attendee capacity
- 30
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Appointments
-
Date Clock time Place Event format to – Online – In-person – In-person – In-person – In-person – In-person – In-person - Description
- The seminar will combine a study of IPE theory with its application in both historical and contemporary contexts.
(A) - The theoretical section will focus on the role of theory building in IPE/GPE. After a brief examination of the ideational roots and development of IPE as a subject, two major theoretical approaches to understanding IPE as an academic discipline will be explored. The first approach views IPE as a potentially interdisciplinary endeavor to bridge the – academic – divide between politics and economics (as sometimes favoured in Britain, Canada and the Netherlands, among other places). The second approach, which is partly an offshoot of the first, will examine how the Gramscian theory of hegemony is applied to IPE by the theorists of the ‘New Italian School’ or ‘Neo Gramscian School’ – with the main theorists coming from Canada, the US and Britain. Finally, in the theoretical section some consideration will be given to the view of IPE as a specific sub-discipline of International Relations (as it is understood e.g. in the United States and, by and large, in Germany).
(B) - This section will apply a version of the 'British School' approach to IPE to analyse the background to globalisation and its current context and a mixture of the ‘British School’ and ‘Neo-Gramscian School’ to interpret the formation of globalization and its impact on the ‘state’, multinational to transnational corporations and such issues as the unipolar/multipolar global divide.
MA-IB-IEL
(International Economic Law)
- Exercise – [IR VRIB - Popovic] International Economic Law
- Teacher
-
- Dorde Popovic
- Max attendee capacity
- 30
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Wednesday 3rd double period ABS/2-01/U In-person
- Exercise – [IR VRIB - Popovic] International Economic Law
- Teacher
-
- Dorde Popovic
- Max attendee capacity
- 30
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Wednesday 4th double period ABS/2-01/U In-person
- Lecture – [IR VRIB - Horst] International Economic Law
- Teacher
-
- Dr. Johan Horst
- Max attendee capacity
- 60
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Monday 6th double period ABS/0E08/H In-person - Description
- Short description:
This course introduces the core principles, rules, and institutions that govern the international economic order. It surveys the principal domains of international economic law (IEL), including the law of the World Trade Organization (WTO), international investment law, regional economic integration, international monetary law, and the regulation of international financial markets. Students will also engage with the contested history of IEL, major debates of the political economy of IEL, and its intersections with human rights, environmental protection, and law and development.
Structure:
§ 1 Introduction
(What is IEL, orthodox, heterodox and postcolonial history of IEL, trade theories, goals, functions and principles of IEL, relationship between Public International Law and IEL)
§ 2 Actors and Legal Sources
(International organisations, regional organisations, private actors, sources of IEL)
§ 3 WTO Law
(Overview, main obligations, exceptions, trade defense instruments, dispute settlement, crisis of the WTO)
§ 4 Regional Economic Integration
(Overview, levels and selected examples, consequences for the multilateral, proliferation of regional dispute settlement procedures)
§ 5 International Investment Law
(investments, legal basis, basic principles of investment protection law, dispute settlement mechanism, crisis of ISDS)
§ 6 International Monetary Law & Financial Markets Law
(Bretton Woods, Currency Exchange, IMF, World Bank Group, Introduction to Financial Markets, role of private actors (ISDA), law and financial crises)
§ 7 IEL and Human Rights/Environmental Law/Development
(Regime-collisions and regime-interactions: corporate social responsibility, sustainable finance, Washington Consensus, Post-Washington Consensus and New International Economic Order) - Literature
-
- General literature:
- - Leïla Choukroune/ James J. Nedumpara, International Economic Law. Text, Cases and Materials, CUP 2022.
- - Matthias Herdegen, Principles of International Economic Law, OUP (3rd ed.) 2024.
- - Asif H. Qureshi/ Andreas R. Ziegler, International Economic Law, Sweet & Maxwell (4th ed.) 2019.
- - Peter Van den Bossche/ Werner Zdouc, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, CUP (4th ed.) 2017, accessible via: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/law-and-policy-of-the-world-trade-organization/934F8BE2FAA1BE69AAAC3E0472DE3FC0
- A detailed outline for each session with additional literature will be provided in class.
MA-IB-SVR
(Spezialfragen des Völkerrechts)
- Seminar – [IR VRIB - Horst] Seminar zum Völkerrecht
- Teacher
-
- Dr. Johan Horst
- Max attendee capacity
- 25
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Enrollment deadline
- From to
- Appointments
-
Date Clock time Place Event format to ABS/0213/U In-person to ABS/0213/U In-person - Description
- Seminar "The Law and Political Economy of the Post-Liberal
International Economic Order"
The law of the international economic order has long been contested terrain, shaped by power asymmetries and colonial legacies, as well as by fundamentally different views on the relationship between law and the economy. Debates over terms of trade, the New International Economic Order (NIEO), the Washington Consensus, and the Post Washington Consensus attest to this. At the heart of these debates lie clashes among economic schools of thought: classical and neoclassical economics, welfare and institutional economics, as well as Keynesian, Neo Ricardian, heterodox, and Marxist approaches. These schools offered fundamentally different views on the purpose and function of law in ordering the international economy, yet they shared one core assumption: that the international economic order is principally shaped by mutually agreed legal rules — that it is, in essence, a legal order.
Today, that premise is increasingly in question amid the erosion of the international rule of law, often framed as the end of liberalism. The familiar divide between liberal/neoliberal positions and heterodox/protectionist positions appears to be giving way to a new fault line between authoritarian unilateralism and proponents of a law based international economic order in a broader sense.
This research seminar examines the implications of this shift for international economic law at doctrinal and theoretical levels. We will survey key historical debates on the political economy of international law and assess their relevance for the present (I.); take an in depth look at the crisis of WTO law and the WTO Appellate Body, analyzing causes, consequences, and possible pathways for reform (II.); examine the crisis of investment arbitration, including legitimacy challenges (III.); engage with recent EU trade agreements (IV.); consider developments in the international regulation of natural resources (V.); and finally debate proposals for the future architecture of a law based international economic order (VI).
The seminar is open to all interested students who are willing to thoroughly engage with the topics and actively participate in the discussions.
Seminar topics
I. Historical debates – what can we learn from them?
1. Reconsidering the terms-of-trade debate
2. A new look at the proposal for a New International Economic Order (NIEO)
3. Beyond Washington Consensus and Post-Washington Consensus?
II. The crisis of WTO law
4. The turn to bilateralism and the future of WTO law
5. The crisis of the WTO Appellate Body and the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA)
III. The EU’s recent trade deals
6. To trade or not to trade 1: A critical assessment of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and the interim Trade Agreement (iTA)
7. To trade or not to trade 2: A critical assessment of the EU-India Free Trade Agreement
IV. The crisis of investment arbitration
8. Investment arbitration and EU law. The spectre of autonomy of EU law.
9. The crisis of investment arbitration: a legitimacy crisis?
V. Resource Law between security interests and ecological concerns
10. The EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act (CRM Act)
11. Regulating the commons: the case of deep-sea mining
VI. To trade or not to trade? Proposals for the way ahead
12. A renewed liberal foundation for the future of international economic law
13. A postcolonial view on the future of international economic law
14. A heterodox view on the future of international economic law
Organizational Notes
The seminar will take place on July, 17-18, 2026.
A preliminary meeting will take place on Tuesday April 14, at 9:20 a.m. in the following virtual conference room: https://tu-dresden.zoom-x.de/j/64067674636?pwd=W1LZDEOtr9WnGf4jBRY0ebhf5R3nop.1.
Registration:
Registration for the seminar via OPAL will take place from Wednesday, April 15, 09:00 a.m., and is possible until Wednesday, April 20, 2026, 23:59 p.m.
OPAL course:
https://bildungsportal.sachsen.de/opal/auth/RepositoryEntry/53521580049?32
Expected Performance
A detailed outline (no more than one to two pages) of the paper must be submitted by Friday, May 22, 2026, at the latest to the following email address: johan.horst@tu-dresden.de.
- Please read the Tips on Writing an Exposé for a Seminar Paper in International Law for further guidance.
During the block seminar, the previous research findings and theses will be presented orally. The length of the presentation is 20 minutes. Approximately 30 minutes are allowed for the subsequent discussion. You are also welcome to prepare questions and hypotheses for the subsequent group discussion. The oral presentation counts for 10% of the grade.
Participants must submit their seminar papers of 20 pages as pdf-documents via email to Dr. Johan Horst (johan.horst@tu-dresden.de) until July 10, 2026.
- Please read the Binding Guidelines for Writing a Paper in International Law for further information.
MA-IB-BVR
(Besonderes Völkerrecht)
- Lecture – [IR VRÖffR - Steiger] Besonderes Völkerrecht/Public International Law II
- Teacher
-
- Prof. Dr. Dominik Steiger
- Max attendee capacity
- 80
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Not specified
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Thursday 5th double period ABS/0E04/U In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Lehrplanung
- Exercise – [IR VRÖffR - Gedik] Besonderes Völkerrecht/Public International Law II
- Teacher
-
- Deniz Gedik
- Max attendee capacity
- 40
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Not specified
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Friday 3rd double period ABS/1-01/U In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Lehrplanung
- Exercise – [IR VRÖffR - Gedik] Besonderes Völkerrecht/Public International Law II
- Teacher
-
- Deniz Gedik
- Max attendee capacity
- 40
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Not specified
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Friday 4th double period ABS/1-01/U In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Lehrplanung
MA-IB-RIO
(Recht der Internationalen Organisationen)
- Lecture – [IR VRÖffR - Skrbic] Recht der Internationalen Organisationen
- Teacher
-
- Ajla Skrbic
- Max attendee capacity
- 80
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Not specified
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Tuesday 3rd double period HSZ/0401/H In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Lehrplanung
MA-IB-CTR
(Complex Actor Constellations and Horizontal Cooperation in the Transnational Realm)
- Seminar – [Pw IP - Holzscheiter] Who is governing the globe? Confronting global problems in times of complexity, fragmentation and shifting power constellations
- Teacher
-
- Prof. Dr. Anna Holzscheiter
- Max attendee capacity
- 35
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Enroll via url
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Tuesday 6th double period ABS/1-01/U In-person - Description
- The study of international relations as well as the practical world of international politics of today are shaped by a commonly accepted diagnosis of increasing institutional complexity and fragmented rule-systems affecting many global challenges. Food security, global warming, migration, health, security, human rights: in all of these areas of international politics, we can observe increasing overlaps between rule-systems and the competencies of international organizations. Competition and new forms of cooperation and coordination between state and nonstate organisations in the transnational realm are the consequence of these overlaps. Shifting power constellations and the rise of regional international organizations are putting immense pressure on long-standing institutions created after 1945. The seminar explores how state and non-state actors confront global issues in highly fragmented institutional landscapes. We will work with old and new theories of International Relations and neighbouring disciplines (International Law, International Political Sociology) in order to find answers to the question of what effective, legitimate and sustainable institutions, norms and policies mean amidst complexity, fragmentation and shifting power constellations. A particular emphasis will be placed on the power of different types of nonstate actors, the ways in which they cooperate with or compete with state actors, and the effects of this rise of private authority on intergovernmental institutions.
- Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Lehrplanung
MA-IB-KVR
(Konstitutionalisierung des Völkerrechts)
- Colloquium – [IR VRÖffR - Skrbic] Critical Approaches to International Law
- Teacher
-
- Ajla Skrbic
- Max attendee capacity
- 20
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Not specified
- Appointments
-
Day of the week Clock time Place Event format Tuesday 4th double period ABS/2-10/U In-person - Assignments
-
- Non-modular
-
- Lehrplanung
MA-IB-TIL
(Topics in International Law)
- Block seminar – [IR VRÖffR - Steiger] Seminar Modul MA-IB-TIL
- Teacher
-
- Prof. Dr. Dominik Steiger
- Max attendee capacity
- 25
- Enrollment
-
- Enrollment via
- Not specified
- Appointments
-
Date Clock time Place Event format to ABS In-person to ABS In-person to ABS In-person