Romy Müller

Dr. rer. nat. Romy Müller

E-Mail senden

Kontaktinformationen

Professur für Ingenieurpsychologie und angewandte Kognitionsforschung

work

Besuchsadresse:

Bürogebäude Zellescher Weg, A225 Zellescher Weg 17

01069 Dresden

Zeige Karte von diesem Ort.

work Tel.
fax Fax: +49 351 463-37741

Forschungsinteressen

In meiner anwendungsorientierteren Forschung beschäftige ich mich vor allem mit der Störungsdiagnose in industriellen Anlagen und der Rolle, die Assistenzsysteme dabei spielen können. Der Fokus liegt darauf, ein Verständnis von Kausalrelationen innerhalb von Verarbeitungsprozessen zu fördern. Dazu führen wir Feldstudien in einer Schokoladenfabrik durch und übersetzen die dort identifizierten Fragestellungen in Laborexperimente, in denen wir Wissen aus der psychologischen Grundlagenforschung und der Human Factors Forschung auf die Gestaltung von Dialogen zwischen Mensch und Assistenzsystem übertragen

Folgende generelle Fragen sind mir besonders wichtig:

Wie können wir Wissen aus der Grundlagenforschung nutzen, um Mensch-Maschine-Kooperation zu verstehen und zu unterstützen? Wie kann zum Beispiel die Literatur zu Entscheidungen und kognitiver Kontrolle unser Verständnis der Anforderungen fördern, mit denen Operators in modularen Chemieanlagen konfrontiert sind?
Wie hängen die Anforderungen, mit denen Operators konfrontiert sind, von den spezifischen Eigenschaften des jeweiligen technischen Systems ab? Wie unterscheiden sie sich zwischen verschiedenen Domänen? Wie unterscheiden sich zum Beispiel die Rollen, Aufgaben und kognitiven Anforderungen von Operators in der Prozessindustrie von denen in der Verarbeitungsindustrie?
Wie können wir Assistenzsysteme so gestalten, dass sie dem Operator nicht nur sagen was er zu tun hat, sondern ihm dabei helfen, die Situation besser einzuschätzen und Kausalrelationen zu verstehen? Was müssen Operators zum Beispiel über die Wechselwirkungen von Maschine, Produkt, Packmittel und Umwelteigenschaften wissen, um Störungsursachen zu finden und zu beheben?

Projekte

Eine Übersicht der Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede unserer aktuellen Projekte findet sich hier

Aktuelle Projekte

MoCa-Dia: Modellieren und Visualisieren von Kausalbeziehungen in Prozessketten: Wie beeinflussen multi-lineare, systemische und kombinierte Methoden die menschliche Störungsdiagnose? (DFG, 2024-2027)
INAK: Interaktives nutzerzentriertes Assistenzsystem für die Knochenchirurgie im Kopfbereich (SAB, 2024-2026)
XRAISE: Erklärbare KI zur Sicherheits-Evaluation im Bahnverkehr (Eisenbahn-Bundesamt, 2024-2025)
XAI-Dia: Erklärbare künstliche Intelligenz in der Störungsdiagnose: Einfluss auf menschliche Diagnoseprozesse und Diagnoseleistung (DFG, 2022-2025)

Abgeschlossene Projekte

HyTec: Hypothesen beim diagnostischen Problemlösen in technischen Domänen: Mentale Grundlage, Prozess und Ergebnis (DFG, 2021-2024)
KoMMDia: Kooperative Mensch-Maschine-Dialoge zur Diagnose und Beseitigung von Störungen an Verarbeitungsanlagen (BMBF, 2017-2020)
PlantCom: Unterstützung technisch vermittelter Kommunikation zwischen Warte und Feld (DFG, 2016-2019)
IdeJo-Action: Ideomotorische Effekte beim gemeinsamen Handeln: Der Einfluss antizipierter Partnerreaktionen auf Handlungskontrollprozesse (DFG, 2014-2016)
Kommunikative Blickbewegungen (PhD grant, 2008-2011)

Lehre

Vorlesungen

Introduction to Cognitive Science / Cognitive Ergonomics
Ingenieupsychologie
Applied Cognitive Research

Seminare

Human Factors Methods in Complex Work Domains
Ingenieurpsychologie und angewandte Kognitionsforschung
Aufmerksamkeit und Blickbewegungen

Interdisziplinäres FLiK-Modul: Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion in Produktionsanlagen

Kooperation von Ingenieurpsychologie, Maschinenbau, Automatisierungstechnik und Berufspädagogik
bestehend aus Vorlesung, Übung, Methodenseminar und Gruppenprojekten

Publikationen

Preprints

Müller, R., & Klausing, W. (2026). When more precision is worse: Do people recognize inadequate scene representations in concept-based explainable AI? arXiv preprint, arXiv:2602.02298, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.02298

Müller, R. (2026). Treating symptoms or root causes: How does information about causal mechanisms affect interventions? arXiv preprint, arXiv:2601.20010, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.20010

Müller, R. (2025). When concept-based XAI is imprecise: Do people distinguish between generalisations and misrepresentations? arXiv preprint, arXiv:2506.17936, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.17936

Zeitschriftenartikel und Buchkapitel

Müller, R., & Pohl, M. (2025). Information acquisition in Adapt/Exchange decisions: When do people check alternative solution principles? Journal of Dynamic Decision Making, 11, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.11588/jddm.2025.1.102021

Müller, R. & Schmidt, J. (2025). Beyond object identification: How train drivers evaluate the risk of collision. Cognition, Technology & Work, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-025-00832-7

Müller, R. (2025). How humans evaluate AI systems for person detection in automatic train operation: Not all misses are alike. Future Transportation, 5(3), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp5030078

Müller, R., Thoß, M., Ullrich, J., Seitz, S., & Knoll, C. (2025). Interpretability is in the eye of the beholder: Human versus artificial classification of image segments generated by humans versus XAI. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(4), 2371-2393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2323263

Schmidt, J., Wollermann, L., Abele, S., & Müller, R. (2024). Concept maps to assess system understanding: Are graphical explanations more accurate than verbal ones? Behavioral Sciences, 14(9), 807. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090807

Müller, R. (2024). How explainable AI affects human performance: A systematic review of the behavioural consequences of saliency maps. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2381929

Müller, R., Dürschmidt, M., Ullrich, J., Knoll, C., Weber, S., & Seitz, S. (2024). Do humans and Convolutional Neural Networks attend to similar areas during scene classification: Effects of task and image type. Applied Sciences, 14(6), 2648. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14062648

Müller, R. (2024). Adapt/Exchange decisions depend on structural and surface features: Effects of solution costs and presentation format. Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030191

Müller, R., Reindel, D. F., & Stadtfeldt, Y. D. (2024). The benefits and costs of explainable artificial intelligence in visual quality control: Evidence from fault detection performance and eye movements. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 34(5), 396-416. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.21032

Schmidt, J., & Müller, R. (2023). Diagnosing faults in different technical systems: How requirements for diagnosticians can be revealed by comparing domain characteristics. Machines, 11(12), 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11121045

Schmidt, J., & Müller, R. (2023). Discipline differences in mental models: How mechanical engineers and automation engineers evaluate machine processes. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 33(6), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.21005

Müller, R., & Urbas, L. (2023). Model-based operator assistance: How to match engineering models with humans’ cognitive representations of their actions? In S. Mukherjee, V. Dutt, & N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Applied Cognitive Science and Technology: Implications of Interactions Between Human Cognition and Technology (pp. 73-88). Singapore: Springer. Link to book chapter

Hesse, P., Kaseler, E. L., Meier, J., Müller, R., & Abele, S. (2022). Logfilegestützte Erfassung und Spezifizierung des Kfz-Diagnoseprozesses von Fachleuten. In S. Schumann, S. Seeber, & S. Abele (Eds.), Digitale Transformation in der Berufsbildung: Konzepte, Befunde und Herausforderungen (Vol. 41, pp. 165-188). Bielefeld: wbv Media GmbH & Co. KG.

Müller, R., Kessler, F., Humphrey, D. W., & Rahm, J. (2021). Data in context: How digital transformation can support human reasoning in cyber-physical production systems. Future Internet, 13, 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13060156

Bönsel, R., & Müller, R. (2021). Shared mental models for cooperative fault diagnosis: Effects on communication and diagnostic performance. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 8(3), 215-244. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHFE.2021.10038369

Müller, R., Paul, D., & Li, Y. (2021). Reformulation of symptom descriptions in dialogue systems for fault diagnosis: How to ask for clarification. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 145, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102516

Dostert, J., & Müller, R. (2021). Motivational assistance system design for industrial production: From motivation theories to design strategies. Cognition, Technology & Work, 23(3), 507-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00643-y

Hillig, S., & Müller, R. (2021). How do conversational case-based reasoning systems interact with their users: A literature review. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40 (14), 1544-1563. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1767207

Müller, R., & Urbas, L. (2020). Adapt or Exchange: Making changes within or between contexts in a modular plant scenario. Journal of Dynamic Decision Making, 6, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.11588/jddm.2020.1.69326

Müller, R. (2020). How do partner reactions affect task set selection: Specific imitation or abstract tasks? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(11), 2008-2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820937918

Müller, R., Gögel, C., & Bönsel, R. (2020). Data or interpretations: Impacts of information presentation strategies on diagnostic processes. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 30(4), 266-281. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20838

Müller, R., Paap, J. H., & Bönsel, R. (2020). Can users infer missing information in conversational case-based reasoning: The effects of providing context. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 7(1), 55-79. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHFE.2020.10029054

Müller, R., & Oehm, L. (2019). Process industries versus discrete processing: How system characteristics affect operator tasks. Cognition, Technology & Work, 21(2), 337-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0511-1

Müller, R., Ullrich, L., Dessel, A.-K., Bengsch, A., Heinze, S., Müller, T., & Oehm, L. (2019). Case-based decision support for fault diagnosis: Do salient ratings discourage situation analysis? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 29(1), 44-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20757

Müller, R. (2019). Cognitive challenges of changeability: Adjustment to system changes and transfer of knowledge in modular chemical plants. Cognition, Technology & Work, 21(1), 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0489-8

Müller, R., & Jung, M. L. (2018). Partner reactions and task set selection: Compatibility is more beneficial in the stronger task. Acta Psychologica, 185, 188-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.02.012

Müller, R., & Urbas, L. (2017). Cognitive challenges of changeability: Multi-level flexibility for operating a modular chemical plant. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 89(11), 1409-1420. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201700029

Müller, R., Narciss, S., & Urbas, L. (2017). Interfacing Cyber-Physical Systems with Human Decision Makers. In H. Song, D. B. Rawat, S. Jeschke & C. Brecher (Eds.), Cyber-Physical Systems: Foundations, Principles and Applications (pp. 145-160). Elsevier.

Müller, R. (2016). Does the anticipation of another person’s compatible reactions facilitate action planning in joint tasks? Psychological Research, 80(4), 464-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0670-0

Müller, R., Helmert, J. R., & Pannasch, S. (2014). Limitations of gaze transfer: Without visual context, eye movements do not to help to coordinate joint action, whereas mouse movements do. Acta Psychologica, 152(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.07.013

Müller, R., Helmert, J. R., Pannasch, S., & Velichkovsky, B. M. (2013). Gaze transfer in remote cooperation: Is it always helpful to see what your partner is attending to? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(7), 1302-1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.737813

Müller, R. (2012). Blickbewegungen in der computermediierten Kooperation: Chancen und Schwierigkeiten in der Verwendung einer weniger expliziten Kommunikationstechnologie. Unpublished dissertation. Dresden: Technische Universität Dresden. Download Dissertation

Pannasch, S., Helmert, J.R., Müller, R. & Velichkovsky, B.M. (2012). The analysis of eye movements in the context of cognitive technical systems: Three critical issues. In A. Esposito, M. A. Esposito, A. Vinciarelli, R. Hoffmann, & V. C. Müller (Eds.) Cognitive Behavioural Systems, LNCS (Vol. 7403, pp. 19-34) Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Link to article

Konferenzbeiträge

Schmidt, J., Wiesend, F., & Müller, R. (2025). How does the context of fault-relevant information influence fault diagnosis? Poster presented at the KogWis 2025, Bochum, September 01-03.

Müller, R. & Knoll, C. (2025). Can visual decisions be manipulated by explainable artificial intelligence? Poster presented at the 67. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Frankfurt am Main, March 09-12.

Schmidt, J., Klausing, W., Zipper, V., & Müller, R. (2025). Complex causal diagrams of faults: Strategies and challenges in reading, understanding, and applying cause-effect relations. Poster presented at the 67. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Frankfurt am Main, March 09-12.

Müller, R. & Blunk, A. (2024). Adapt/Exchange decisions or generic choices: Does framing influence how people integrate qualitatively different risks? Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 46, 3904-3910. Link to Conference Paper

Schmidt, J., Rix, E., Hesse, P., Abele, S., & Müller, R. (2024). Validity of concept mapping for assessing mental models of system functioning. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 46, 3407-3414. Link to Conference Paper

Müller, R. (2024). Abstraction in action coding and susceptibility to irrelevant spatial information: Are social action effects less influential when people pursue meaningful goals? Talk at the 66. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Regensburg, March 17-20.

Müller, R., Thoß, M., Ullrich, J., Weber, S., Knoll, C., & Seitz, S. (2023). Do humans and CNN better understand the visual explanations generated by other humans or XAI algorithms? Talk at the 2nd TRR 318 Conference: Measuring Understanding. Paderborn, Germany, November 6-7. Link to Extended Abstract

Müller, R., Mangold, A., Ott, F., & Schmidt, S. (2023). Overtrust in explainable AI that is only partly correct: Do people search for non-highlighted faults during visual quality control? Talk at the 13. Fachgruppentagung der AOW- und Ingenieurspsychologie 2023. Kassel, Germany, September 12-15.

Schmidt, J., & Müller, R. (2023). Diagnosing faults in different technical systems: How domain characteristics can be used to predict requirements for diagnosticians. Talk at the 13. Fachgruppentagung der AOW- und Ingenieurspsychologie. Kassel, Germany, September 12-15.

Müller, R., Reindel, D.F., & Stadtfeld, Y.D. (2023). How does correct and incorrect explainable artificial intelligence affect visual search? Poster presented at the 65. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen. Trier, Germany, March 26-29.

Schmidt, J., Kaseler, E. L., Wollermann, L., & Müller, R. (2023). Can people better express their understanding of system functioning graphically or verbally? Poster presented at the 65. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen. Trier, Germany, March 26-29.

Müller, R. (2022). Herausforderungen der Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion: Das Dilemma zwischen leicht bedienbaren Systemen und Übervertrauen in Technik. Talk at the 15th Annual Meeting of the DGFT Deutsche Gesellschaft für Feinwerktechnik, Dresden, October 13-14.

Hesse, P., Kaseler, E. L., Müller, R., & Abele, S. (2022). Logfile- und blickdatenbasierte Erfassung des Diagnoseprozesses von Experten in einer Kfz-Computersimulation. Talk at the 7th Journal of Technical Education (JOTED) Technology Didactics Symposium and BPT 10th Anniversary Celebration. Stuttgart, Germany, November 23-25.

Kaseler, E. L., Müller, R., Schmidt, J., Hesse, P., & Abele, S. (2022). Functional understanding of car mechatronic trainees and its relation to fault diagnosis performance. Talk at the 11th EARLI SIG14 Conference 2022, Paderborn, Germany, August 17-19.

Hesse, P., Kaseler, L., Müller, R., Abele, S. (2021). Logfile- und blickdatenbasierte Erfassung des Diagnoseprozesses von Experten in einer Kfz- Computersimulation. Talk at the Sektionstagung Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik. Bamberg, Germany, September 15-17.

Müller, R. (2020). Was unterscheidet Schokolade von Flugzeugen und Handys: Domänenspezifität in der Mensch-Maschine-Kooperation. Keynote at the BMBF conference "Technikbasierte Dienstleistungssysteme", Frankfurt, July 09.

Müller, R. (2020). Why psychologists should know about chocolate: A domain-centred perspective on human-machine cooperation. Talk at the TU Kaiserslautern Cognitive Science Colloquium, Kaiserslautern, January 16.

Müller, R. (2019). Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion in Produktionsanlagen: Sollten Nutzerschnittstellen es dem Menschen einfach machen? Talk at the 20th Anniversary of VDMA Software und Digitalisierung, Würzburg, November 14.

Jaster, S., & Müller, R. (2019). Conception of interfaces to represent functional relations in a packaging machine. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Nantes, France, October 2-4.

Koshman, N., Blümel, R., Bönsel, R., & Müller, R. (2019). Machine effectiveness made understandable: Integrated displays that inform operators about effectiveness components and possible interventions. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Nantes, France, October 2-4.

Mesletzky, L., & Müller, R. (2019). Eliciting strategies for diagnosing faults of packaging machines: A scenario-based study with maintenance technicians. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Nantes, France, October 2-4.

Müller, R. & Urbas, L. (2019). Adapt or Exchange: Supporting decisions in modular plants with process relations or cases. Poster presented at the EuroCogSci 2019, Bochum, September 2-4.

Gögel, C., Bönsel, R., & Müller, R. (2019). Data or interpretations: The consequences of presenting different types of information in assistance systems for fault diagnosis. Poster presented at the 38th Meeting of the European Group of Process Tracing Studies, Dresden, June 12-14.

Blunk, A., Bönsel, R., & Müller, R. (2019). Understanding question intent in dialogue systems: The impact of explanations and clarifications on user behavior and confidence. Poster presented at the 61. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, London, April 14-17.

Müller, R. (2019). Assistenzsysteme für komplexe Produktionsanlagen: Wie viel Information braucht der Bediener? Talk at VDMA Mitgliederversammlung NuV, Dresden, April 11.

Müller, R. (2019). Partner reactions affect task set selection: The roles of specific imitation and abstract task set compatibility. Talk at the 61. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, London, April 14-17.

Müller, R. (2019). Warum die Eisbären uns nicht motivieren, gegen den Klimawandel vorzugehen: Psychologie und Umweltschutz. Talk at the 25th Anniversity of the Dresdener Seniorenakademie, Dresden, November 05.

Müller, R. (2018). Psychologie und Klimaschutz. Talk at the 23. Tag der Erneuerbaren Energien, Oederan, April 28.

Müller, R., Wienß, E., & Bärwinkel, H. (2018). Does task asymmetry determine the influence of anticipated partner reactions on task set selection? Poster presented at the 60. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Marburg, March 11-14.

Müller, R. (2018). Assistenzsysteme für komplexe Produktionsanlagen: Wie viel Information braucht der Bediener? Talk at Packnet 12/2018, Dresden, December 13.

Gögel, C., Bönsel, R., & Müller, R. (2018). Operator strategies in the food processing industry: Individual differences in handling machine faults. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Berlin, October 8-10.

Bönsel, R., Schegner, L., Heinze, S., & Müller, R. (2018). Supporting collaborative fault diagnosis: Complete information transfer or strategic hypothesis testing? Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Berlin, October 8-10.

Rahm, J., Graube, M., Müller, R., Klaeger, T., Schegner, L., Schult, A., Bönsel, R., Carsch, S., Oehm, L., & Urbas, L. (2018). KoMMDia: Dialogue-driven assistance system for fault diagnosis and correction in cyber-physical production systems. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, Torino, September 4-7.

Müller, R. & Paul, D. (2018). Common ground with dialogue systems for fault diagnosis: How should they ask for clarification? Poster presented at the KogWis 2018, Darmstadt, September 3-6.

Müller, R. (2018). Human-machine cooperation in highly automated systems. Talk at the ARC Industry Forum Europe, Barcelona (Sitges), May 15-16.

Bönsel, R., Schegner, L., Heinze, S., Urbas, L., & Müller, R. (2018). The impact of shared mental models on team performance in a fault diagnosis task. Poster presented at the 60. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Marburg, March 11-14.

Müller, R., Dessel, A.-K., Bengsch, A., Heinze, S., & Oehm, L. (2017). Case-based decision support for fault diagnosis: Salient outcome ratings do not discourage thorough situation analysis. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Rome, September 28-30.

Müller, R. (2017). Mensch-Maschine-Kooperation in hochautomatisierten Systemen. Talk at the VVD-Anwenderforum, Dresden, September 26.

Müller, R. (2017). Anticipated partner reactions do not affect grasp initiation in joint object manipulation. Poster presented at the 59. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Dresden, March 27-29.

Müller, R. (2017). Coherence judgements in the Remote Associates Task are faster when people believe that another human has seen the triad before. Talk at the 59. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Dresden, March 27-29.

Müller, R. & Jung, M.L. (2016). Incompatible partner reactions improve performance in the weaker task of a picture-word interference paradigm – But only if they can be ignored. Talk at the 58. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Heidelberg, March 21-23.

Oehm, L., Müller, T., Müller, R., Ziegler, J., Majschak, J.-P., Urbas, L., & Schult, A. (2016). Kooperative Störungsdiagnose durch Bediener und Assistenzsystem für Verarbeitungsanlagen. Poster presented at the Zweite Transdisziplinäre Konferenz: Technische Unterstützungssysteme, die die Menschen wirklich wollen. Hamburg, December 12-13.

Müller, R., Ullrich, L., Müller, T., Ziegler, J., & Oehm, L. (2016). Case-based decision support for fault diagnosis: The impact of salient case ratings on situation analysis and solution focus. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Prague, October 26-28.

Riese, L., Dostert, J., Hoffmann, R., Pfeffer, J., Urbas, L, & Müller, R. (2016). Communication between control room and field operators in the process industries. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Prague, October 26-28.

Müller, R. (2015). Der Mensch auf Standby: Wie Automatisierung unser Denken und Handeln beeinflusst. Talk at the Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft Herbstkonferenz, Dresden, September 21-22.

Müller, R. (2015). Visualisierung von Blickübertragung: Cursors, Highlights und Spotlights. Talk at the Ebiss Workshop, Dortmund, December 03-04.

Müller, R. (2015). Temporally compatible partner reactions facilitate action initiation and produce contrast effects on movement duration. Talk at the EuroAsianPacific Joint Conference on Cognitive Science, Torino, September 25-27.

Müller, R. (2015). Joint spatial and temporal response-effect compatibility: Do anticipated reactions of a partner facilitate the planning and execution of hand movements? Poster presented at the 6th Joint Action Meeting, Budapest, July 1-4.

Müller, R. (2015). The impact of anticipated partner reactions on attentional selection. Talk at the 57. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Hildesheim, March 8-11.

Müller, R. (2014). The effects of observing other people’s gaze: Faster intuitive judgments of semantic coherence. Poster presented at the KogWis 2014, Tübingen, September 29 - October 2. Download short paper

Lambeck, C., Fohrholz, C., Leyh, C., Supulniece, I., & Müller, R. (2014). Commonalities; Contrasts: An Investigation of ERP Usability in a Comparative User Study. Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Information Systems. Tel Aviv, Israel.

Lambeck, C., Müller, R., Fohrholz, C., & Leyh, C. (2014). (Re-) Evaluating User Interface Aspects in ERP Systems - An Empirical User Study. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences. Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA.

Müller, R., & Kammer, D. (2013). Does the anticipation of a partner's reaction affect action planning? Spatial action-effect compatibility in a joint task. Poster presented at the CogSci 2013, Berlin, July 31 - August 3.

Müller, R. (2013). Response-effect compatibility with self-generated and partner-produced effects. Poster presented at the 55. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Vienna, March 25-27.

Kammer, D., Müller, R., Wojdziak, J., Zavesky, M., Weyprecht, P., Schönefeld, F., & Groh, R. (2012). Innovationspotenzial validieren: Anwendungsgebiete für die 3D-Plattform Bildsprache LiveLab. Innovationsforum open4INNOVATION2012 regional kooperativ-global innovativ Beiträge zum Fachforum. Technische Universität Dresden, Germany.

Müller, R., Helmert, J.R., Pannasch, S., & Velichkovsky B.M. (2011). Following closely? The effects of viewing conditions on gaze versus mouse transfer in remote cooperation. Paper presented at the Dual Eyetracking Workshop 2011, Aarhus, September 24-28. Download full paper

Müller, R., Helmert, J.R., Pannasch, S., & Velichkovsky B.M. (2011). In search for the optimal communication means in joint cooperation: Gaze versus mouse transfer. Poster presented at the 16th European Conference on Eye Movements, Marseille, August 21-25.

Müller, R., Helmert, J.R., Pannasch, S., & Velichkovsky B.M. (2010). How does the level of interaction mediate the benefit of gaze transfer in a cooperative puzzle task? Talk at the KogWis 2010. Potsdam, October 3-6.

Müller, R. (2010). Gaze transfer in computer-mediated cooperation. Talk at the Fourth International Conference on Cognitive Science, Tomsk, June 21-26.

Müller, R., Reiche, A., Pannasch, S. & Velichkovsky B.M. (2010). Communication by way of gaze transfer: Using eye-movement data to improve computer-mediated cooperation in a puzzle solving task. Poster presented at the 52.Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Saarbrücken, March 22-24.

Müller, R., Pannasch, S. & Velichkovsky B.M. (2009). Comparing eye movements for perception and communication: Changes in visual fixation durations and saccadic amplitudes. Perception 38 ECVP Abstract (suppl), p. 23.

Müller, R., Pannasch, S. & Velichkovsky B.M. (2009). Gaze-based communication influences visual fixation durations and saccadic amplitudes. Poster presented at the 51. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Jena, March 29 - April 1.

Helmert, J.R., Müller, R., Pannasch, S., & Velichkovsky, B.M. (2008). Influence of scene background and spatial arrangement of objects on gaze behaviour. Perception 37 ECVP Abstract (suppl), p. 95.

Andere Interessen

Meine Pferde Maymun, Aahnuu, Summy, Pia und Jolie