Prestressed concrete between success and failure

Table of contents

1. 1. 1. Project data
      2. Report from annual report 2024/25
      3. Report from annual report 2023
      4. Summary

Project data

Titel | Title Erfolg und Misserfolg: Zum Beitrag erkannter Fehler für die Entwicklung der Spannbetonbauweise | Success and Failure: On the Contribution of Recognised Failures to the Development of Prestressed Concrete Construction Förderer | Funding Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) / SPP 2255 Zeitraum | Period 10/2023 – 09/2026 Leiter | Project manager Prof. Dr.-Ing. Steffen Marx Bearbeiter | Contributor Jakob Vogt

Report from annual report 2024/25

Prestressed bridges – unknown diversity?

In September 2024, the Carola Bridge in Dresden partly collapsed. Shortly afterwards, a number of petitions called for the bridge to be rebuilt according to original plans from 1895, in other words, a rejection of the familiar prestressed concrete design. In some cases, prestressed concrete is still considered to have persistent structural weaknesses. Existing bridges are therefore not always valued. Is this a general problem of prestressed concrete structures with their “hidden” technical finesse? Prestressed concrete construction can look back on more than 100 years of history. Numerous companies entered the market, particularly in the post-war period, and participated in the rebuilt of the infrastructure. The urge for progress was immense and many prestressing methods were created, which led to the further development of construction methods and types of concrete bridges. As a result, more than twenty different tensioning methods can be identified, which differ in terms of their tendons, anchoring, and handling. Only some have survived to this day, others have fallen into oblivion for a variety of reasons, some of which are unclear.

The well-known statement “You can only preserve what you know” also applies to the numerous prestressed concrete structures and the prestressing methods used. The research project “Success and failure: The significance of detected errors for the development of prestressed structures” aims to make a significant contribution. As a first step, all post-tensioning systems used in bridge structures are systematically analyzed based on approval documents. Building on this, development trends and relationships between the systems are identified.

It is assumed that damage mechanisms such as inadequate grouting, stress corrosion cracking, and issues at coupling joints led to modifications in the systems, resulting in different generations with specific inherent characteristics. These generations are examined in detail to capture the development of prestressing systems as well as their interrelationships, taking into account both their strengths and weaknesses. The insights gained can significantly improve the assessment of existing structures and contribute to a better understanding of development processes in prestressed concrete construction, while also helping to guide future innovations more effectively.

Report from annual report 2023

On the history of prestressed structures

The development of prestressed concrete construction has a significant impact on today’s construction methods and can be considered a success story. While the accomplishments of notable players like Finsterwalder and Freyssinet in the construction, e.g., of the Nibelungen Bridge and the Pont du Lucanzy are well known, there have also been demanding challenges and failures. However, in the technical history of prestressed concrete, these challenges and failures have not yet been fully explored. But an investigation of these failures can contribute to a better understanding of existing structures and help to preserve them.

The golden era of prestressed concrete construction dates back to the period between the 1930s and the 1980s, interrupted by the Second World War. In the pre-war period, knowledge of building materials in terms of creep, shrinkage and relaxation was discovered and deepened. After the war, numerous prestressed concrete structures were built, which led to an acceleration of development, especially in terms of bridge construction. After a while, crack damage appeared in those structures, and a variety of publications discussed the correct handling of, for example, thermal expansion, couplings, or deflection forces. New methods of construction and consequently, new areas of application were developed during this time period.

As part of the DFG Priority Program 2255 “Construction as cultural heritage”, this study aims to provide a detailed examination of the eventful high modern era. The result will be a critical history of prestressed concrete construction technology in terms of its successes and failures. The study analyzes bridge structures located in German-speaking countries, with a focus on the planning, construction, and fabrication processes. The research also examines the exchange of information about failures within the professional community and the development of standards. The investigation is carried out under constant consideration of the state of research and knowledge at the time and evaluates these from a current perspective. The overall question to be answered by the project is whether failed developments in prestressed concrete construction also represent a criterion for heritage status.

Summary

Prestressed concrete construction is associated with the high modern era like no other construction method. Its beginnings in the 1880s were initially primarily interesting engineering solutions to the problem of cracks in concrete. In the 20th century, prestressing became a disruptive innovation. It developed towards the most important construction method for filigree and wide-span concrete structures, despite several scientific and technical dead ends, misguided developments and cases of damage. The success story of prestressed concrete is sufficiently documented. However, an in-depth analysis of failures as innovation drivers is still pending.

In addition, the project refers to the initial core problem of SPP 2255: the increased demolition of civil engineering structures of the high modern era. Prestressed concrete structures are predestined to be overlooked, because their essential construction is invisible in the concrete and the valuable innovation often lies in structural details. An appropriate appreciation of prestressed concrete structures is therefore still a desideratum today. The main objective of the project is therefore to write a critically reflected construction history of prestressed concrete between success and failure as a basis for the heritage conservation of prestressed concrete buildings in Germany.

The manifold problems in the history of prestressed concrete, e.g. scientific misconceptions, insufficient theoretical penetration, difficulties on the building site, errors in detail, have so far often been marginalised. An essential part of the work is the identification, description and classification of failures and undesirable developments in the planning, design and construction process. Based on this, it will be explored how these mistakes have promoted and influenced the further development of the construction method. Another thesis is that disputes about "correct" procedures and "incorrect" assumptions have been arisen in the expert community especially with regard to concrete construction projects, which will be examined in depth. Furthermore, the question should be answered why, especially in the early phase, the actors involved adhered to prestressed concrete and pushed its further development despite sometimes considerable setbacks. Differences and their reasons between the state of the art regulated in standards and the current state of research as well as forms and limits of knowledge transfer across national borders will be worked out. Finally, interesting prestressed concrete buildings will be examined in terms of whether they are worthy of protection according to classical monument criteria or whether an expansion of the criteria is necessary.

The project focuses primarily on the development of prestressed concrete in Germany, especially in bridge construction. Influences from France, especially in the first half of the high modern era, and Switzerland in the second half are also taken into consideration.